is shai gilgeous-alexander unstoppable because Free throws shoots, or a ton of free throwing shoots because He won’t be prevented?
The SGA is second in NBA with 8.9 attempts to throw freely in each game, which has become the subject of a very misleading discussion online. Yes, he pushs out of contact and yes, his goal is moving through a ton of free throwing away. But his 8.9 is not a foreign player in the history of NBA’s main goalscorers, because the freely throwing attempts to arrive over routines over 10 to the main boys (this number James Harden).
But, that’s not the purpose. Because if you are ready to come with me, I think boys like SGA — foul hunting and all — in fact healthy For basketball football.
First things first: Following ability it makes it Someone who is not left, not the other way around. Isn’t it the ability to reach the free throwing line of Joel Embid? and Giannis Antitoconmums…and James Harden…and Michael Jordan, LeBron James and Oh Stay tuned Every amazing player in NBA’s history bigger?
Harden awarded the MVP Award for more free throwing away from the king, and all this asks me whether asking “Is the SGA A free throwing business?” It is a wrong question. Hidden is a bigger and more real question: Is the hunting footle in fact bad for NBA?
Let’s consider the effects of any answer: if hunting is dirty. is It is bad, then NBA had to make a major change in the laws of mediation. Trying to follow in a senseless manner is effective, and there is a reason that all the best goalscorers are the best to reach the line. SGA is not exempt from that, and the NBA’s goal leader is almost always in the three main ones in the free throwing (stephen is the main synthetic work, and how much it comes from doing his goal from three points).
If NBA is less effective – by punishing the attacking players for the start of a relationship or by expanding the ways that defenders can legally compete with – Conservatives had to radically change how they play. Most fans invited these changes, they wanted the game to be more “moral” and see less standing.
But there is already an unofficial obstacle to the strategy, because it is ugly hunting with ugly words why guards such as SGA and Harden have been less successful in history in history, when the bullets become more severe. But if the course is actually pushing it and trying to officially “good” the question of this, it wants more than an objective arbitration; radical changes will be needed. And will all of these actually be good?
Reducing the effect of ugly hunting will significantly reduce the value of driving for the basket, which of course players want more than three more. 2013-05-28 16:00:00 completely against him. Make sure, the game initially became “more physical”… until the attacks completely give up physical and only space, space, space for jumps of shots. and are we really wanting further three? The league is certainly not like this.
What about the removal of free throwing? That’s still useless. Any penalty below the “points” will cause the same three points of the Apocalyps, and some external ideas such as 5-4 Power Play or removal of the bonus will pollute an attacking player. it’s meaningless Influential, contrary to what we all want.
I don’t see in short, how the observer NBA is freed from a world where the drawing is not a legitimate strategy. The court tends to be more balanced, and makes crimes actually use every 94 feet. Perhaps all the SGA is really exploiting the rules that keep the game where it is going to be. we need Fauld hunting to watch the course as we want. It is not immoral, but completely natural. Because the real basket is not clean, the best players have understood for decades. SGA is just the latest example.