The recent examples of misuse of immorality are very very common. In 2016, for example, Mark Elia, founder and chairman of the Elilla LLA law group, deeply involved in the creation of a false “dise” by a foreign citizen who was drafted to provide a false basis for the implementation of federal law to investigate a presidential candidate. Elila also deliberately tried to hide the role of her temple – Hillary Clinton, failed presidential candidate – in the case.
The immigration system – which is widespread fraud and unfair demands that have replaced the constitutional and legal principles that the heads of the main authorities implement according to Article 2 of the US Constitution – are also full of unscrupulous behavior by lawyers and legal companies. For example, immigration, and practicing the strong law for Bono, often train their customers to hide their past or lie about their conditions while emphasizing asylum seekers, all in an attempt to escape immigration policies to protect our national security and deceive immigration authorities and courts. The collection of necessary information to thwart these false demands will impose a huge burden on the federal government. And this fraud in return questions the integrity of our immigration laws and our legal profession in a broader manner—in order to do anything about the undeniable and tragic consequences of illegal mass immigrants, both in terms of heinous crimes against innocent victims such as Laye Royli.
The Federal Law of Civil Procedures bans 11 in which lawyers participate in certain immoral behaviors in federal courts. Lawyers should not present legal records, including “for harassment, the cause of unnecessary delay, or increase the cost of trial” FRCP 11(B)(1). Lawyers must be sure that their statements about the facts are “authorized on the basis of evidence support, or a belief that actually exists. FRCP 11(B)(3)-(B)(4). When these commands are violated, the opposing parties have the authority to make a proposal for the punishments. FRCP 11(C). The text of the law, especially the punishment of their lawyers and companies, as well as to the humiliated parties and provides it according to the duties of honor that lawyers must respect the rule of law and raise the legal system of our nation with integrity. In addition, law 3.1 of the laws of the example of professional behavior states that “the lawyer must not raise an issue, or emphasize or debate, unless there is a basis in the law and truth to do this that is not insignificant.
Unfortunately, many lawyers and law companies have long ignored these conditions as they are against the federal government or in the unfounded party attacks. To resolve these concerns, I will send the prosecutor general to call for punishment against lawyers and law companies that are unreasonable, irrational and annoying against the United States or on issues facing the executive and US agencies.
I am more likely to direct the prosecutor general and the secretary of the internal security to put their rules advocate that he is the guardian of behavior and discipline. see, for example8 cfr 292.1 and the following.; 8 CFR 1003.1 and the following.; 8 cfr 1292.19.
I am more prosecuted to take all appropriate measures to send disciplined to any lawyer who violates the laws of professional behavior in the Federal Court or before any structure of the federal government, including lawsuits and disagreements, especially in cases that include national security, internal security, public safety or integrity. In compliance with this guideline, the prosecutor general must take into account the moral duties that law partners have during the supervision of small lawyers, including the immorality of the ethical behavior of small lawyers for partners or law companies at the right time.
I further direct that the prosecutor generally determines that one behavior by a lawyer or a legal company in trial against the federal government will demand punishment or other disciplinary measures, in consultation with any senior CEO, a proposal to the president.
I am more likely to direct the prosecutor general, in consultation with any relevant senior executive, to review the behavior by lawyers or legal companies in trial against the federal government over the past eight years. If the prosecutor general identifies a bad behavior that may require more measures, such as registration of meaningless trials or participation in fake actions, the prosecutor will be directed to propose the president through the Vice-President for Internal Policy.
Law companies and individual lawyers have a great power, and have a duty to serve the rule of law, justice and rules. Along with the president’s lawyer, the prosecutor’s office occasionally reports to the president about improving companies to hold this vision.