A new study is recounting energy debate on his head, showing the great benefits of transmission to the source of renewable energy such as the sun, wind and hydro. The study found that this is better for the planet and is smarter and more financially reward for investors and the economy.
The study tested two of the future of Potancell’s energy in 149 countries by The results have shown that renewable energy will be better than carbon holding in terms of both continuity and costly effects.
The study found that a resistant change of energy could reduce energy demand by 54.4% and reduce energy costs by 59.6%. More importantly, it can reduce social costs, including health care and environmental damage, by about 91.8%.
Renewal energy is a step forward for the planet—and a smart commercial movement that offers huge financial recovery. Clean energy companies have proved their continuity that they are better investment than dirty fuel shares, have gone through long-term growth.
“If you spend $1 in carbon supply instead of wind, water and solar, you will increase CO2, air pollution, energy supplies, energy, pipes and social costs,” said Mark Jacobson, a professor at Stanford University.
Investors are already recognizing the great pure energy capacity not only in terms of environmental influence but also in creating jobs, economic resistance and long-term profits. The pure economy provides a lot of opportunity, from new businesses to infrastructure development, helping to build a more continuous future for workers and users as well.
Now see: CEO reveals the energy form that ‘thorn political lines are for more than a decade.
While past efforts around environmental, social and governance investment may have been wrongly directed, clean economic violence is not prevented. Pure energy is no longer just a trend — a proven and optional way forward. Politicians and investors are also increasingly considering renewed energy as a foundation stone for economic growth, creating jobs and resistance.
“The cost of using clean and renewable energy is always the cost of using the air instead of changing a source of rock fuel,” Jacobson said. “You are preventing renewable energy to change the source of rock fuel, because you will create more demand for these renewable energy.
“The only way to eliminate all gases, climate particles and climate climates is to eliminate burning,” the authors wrote.
Participate in our free news good news and useful adviceand don’t miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.