Nigel Faraj’s anger at British Reform

Reform president Nigel Faraj this week presented a brave face because he tried to put a large row and one of his party’s MPs was suspended behind him.

The party is still in the surveys and Mondays and Mondays,, 29 council members exhibited They had recently erected for reform in the UK.

While Faraj admits that there was a “slight turmoil”, he insisted that the discomfort “very of the edges.

But does the inconveniences within the party go deeper than what he has proposed?

In a party that is now proud of more than 200,000 members and 400 local branches across the country, the divisions have become more intense.

Most of the anger is directed at the head of Faraj and reform, Zia Yousef, for their efforts to make the party professional.

The party is more ruthless in its candidates’ Viting. It also conducts research – and in some cases it shows – members because of their activities on social media.

Faraj is said to be desperate to avoid another election campaign in which he faces constant questions about the controversial statements of his candidates.

However, while the party is preparing for local elections in May, it faces a major challenge to control the powerless elements in its basic membership, which is protested by the leadership.

In recent months, the BBC has learned that at least 12 interim heads of local reform branches have resigned over the party’s leadership behavior.

A British reform spokesman said the resignation was 2 percent of the seats.

“Our understanding is that the other parties have much more than they have,” the spokesman said.

“Sorry, we have lost 2 percent of the branch seats, some of which have failed to test.

One of the presidents was Maria Botel, a member of the Council of the Eastern Yorkshire, who delivered a speech at the British Reform Party conference last year.

In his resignation letter, he said he felt “was” in his role, described the election of his party’s candidates as “rioters” and accused his leadership of integrity.

Other members have resigned on the grounds of freedom of speech, including Hold Cox, who stood up as the British reform candidate in the general election and polls in London.

He said he was threatened with expulsion for criticizing the dealings with Tommy Robinson, an extreme right-wing activist.

“Now my inboxes have flooded basic reformists who are unbelievable and feel political optimism has been betrayed,” Cox told the BBC.

“More than dozens of reform branches have contacted him and said that they have taken their place and were surprised and insulted by the Zia Yousef headquarters team,” he said.

The heads of other branches have given up the differences in politics, especially the issue of “clean deportation”, which Faraj called “political impossible.

Jack Davison, former head of the Dover branch and the Dil, said the party would “approve the many characteristics of the institution it was trying to do.

“This culture of ‘silence’ is very worrying,” he said.

Another former head of the Newcastle branch in Newcastle, Dan Dan Astle, said the party was “not devolent properly.

He said the British reform constitution, approved last year, allowed the party’s executive committee to have a final statement on the expulsion and appointment of a new leader.

But for many disgruntled members, the accusations against Rupert Loy have made the most angry and disappointed.

The MP was suspended by the UK’s reforms on charges of speaking badly at his office, as well as a police investigation into threats against the party leader, Yusuf.

Loy has refused to do anything wrong and his supporters gathered around him, accusing his leadership of trying to force him to dare to challenge him.

The row of the row was not for former British vice president Ben Habib, who left the party, referring to “basic differences with Faraj.

He told the BBC that Faraj’s idea of ​​professionalism was “probably the deliberate destruction of the basic movement.

“The book against Rupert Loy has been used around the primary,” he said.

The BBC presented some of the criticisms to the party leader, Joseph.

He said Britain’s reform under Faraj had brought “the biggest political acceleration in British history,” he said, to “some of the sources of the two old parties.

Yousef, who was appointed president last year after the general election, said the party had searched thousands of people and “majority has passed.

But some don’t, he said, “Only with the territory of becoming a professional party.

Yousef says the UK’s vetering system was “very more tougher than anything else that other parties are doing.

“Of course, anything that grows in this size will be some dental problems,” he said.

The recent surfaces that have recently cut off to voters.

One of the recent polls suggested That the party is divided with one-third of the reformists and believe that the party will be better under a different leader, but the same amount of money that the party will be worse.

The survey also showed that the extraction of Faraj with reforms with reforms has fallen since Roy Lowa.

But the latest Yougov survey has put reforms in Britain 23 percent of the vote, after the Labor Party by 24 percent, but 22 percent before the conservatives.

Gawain Tauler still believes in Faraj’s leadership, despite being sacked as head of British reform journalist last year.

Taller said that recently, as speaker of parliament has been several branch meetings and witnessed very little conflict.

He said Britain’s reforms in last year’s general election won 4.1 million votes “with a large operation and an army of volunteers who worked on their collections without paying any money.

“We must get at least 10 million people to succeed,” he said. “You won’t find six million votes on our right. You’ll go crazy if you calm some people outside the party.

For now, the party’s attention has been trained on the upcoming local elections. He has high hopes in Lincolnshair that the candidate of Andrea Jenkins, a former member of the Tori, is competing for the mayor.

Reform sources say special local polls have made them optimistic about winning the highest elected office.

But in order to become a serious candidate to win a general election, British reform may have to take a tougher hand in its principles.

It may also have to convince members to support some of the uncomfortable compromises that other main parties are making to attract more voters.