Is Zenelnsky Mowling a summer poll?

Since Ukraine’s cities are being bombed by Russia at night, the idea of ​​holding elections may be imaginary.

But in the streets and offices of the capital, Kiev, the horizon of the country’s going to the polls is discussed again.

Rumors have come and left in the three-year war of the entire war in Russia.

Every time the government, the opposition and the people have been expelled from their jobs equally, the PUK must take the lead against the Russian occupier.

A 2024 presidential election was supposed to be adopted in Ukraine after the Russian invasion was completed two years earlier.

But this has not led the Kremlin to claim that President Volodymyr Zenlensky is an illegitimate leader and calls for new elections as a condition for a ceasefire deal – a repetition of a speech by President Trump.

There is now a new congestion in the discussions that Zelensky may think just as the ceasefire talks continue, and some sources speak to the BBC that there are reasons for thinking about the elections later this year.

The closest president’s closest rival, Valery Zuzhin, former Ukrainian army commander, has felt the need for refusal to be refuted about his intentions.

“My response to this has not changed,” he told RBC-OKraine news agency. “While the war continues, we all have to work to save the country, not think about the elections. I will not comment on any vote.

The fact that Zaluzhani, who is shy, and shy, who is now the Ukrainian ambassador to London, has felt the need for a statement.

Ukrainian Election Commission, Ole Dindeenko, also openly discusses these things.

“The law must be changed before any election is held,” he told Ukraine news website. He said the current rules have stated that parliamentary elections must be held 60 days after the lifting of the military law, and 90 days of presidential elections.

But it will take more time due to the war, which will require legal changes.

The Economist claimed that Zelensky held a meeting last week to discuss the election and instructed employees to prepare for the vote, when the United States forced Russia to accept a ceasefire, which is likely to be on Estar.

The report was rejected by several government sources.

“There are fake information there,” a US presidential source told the BBC News. “There were no such meetings and there were no such guidance.

Government sources said it was the main importance of achieving peace and there was little hope that the war would end with the Ester holiday.

So in contrast to many public denials, why do some still think there may be an election in Ophing?

First, some sources indicate that Zelensky’s support for polls has risen since he was harassed by Donald Trump and JDVEVEVAS at the White House.

In a survey of the International Institute of Sociology KYIS (KYIS), in March, the number of Ukraines who trusted Zelensky rose a couple of points by 69 percent last month.

Diplomats say the president may think that he is now the best chance of winning a second round, not waiting for political divisions after the war.

Second, the winning of the second round calls Zelensky a Russian blofe and will strengthen his hand in any long-term peace talks. Last week, US President Vladimir Putin said the United Nations should take over Ukraine and organize a “democratic presidential election. His hypothesis – might be wrong – is that Zelensky replaced him.

Third, the military law must be renewed by the vote of parliament in early May. Zelensky can use the timetable for the declaration of war law to be allowed to go through the elections at the end of the summer.

Fourth, Americans are convinced of elections. “They have agreed to him. Elections will be held in Ukraine,” Trump’s special envoy Steve Whitkov told Taker Carlson’s podcast on March

Zelensky could have used the pressure from the United States—which the Russian narrative would be revised – as an excuse to tell voters that he had no choice but to hold elections.

Fifth, some Ukrainian sources believe that logistical barriers can be passed in the elections.

Millions of citizens have been displaced abroad, on the front lines and in the occupied territories. Some say, some say, is to allow people to vote for the use of the smartphone app called Diia. This includes basic documents such as passports, identity cards and driver’s licenses.

Some say the use of diaa allows people to vote quickly, cheaply and safely without having to travel to a polling station abroad or in trenches. They say the Ukrainians have successfully used it to vote in the Eurovigen race. President Zenlensky has also donated nearly £20 as a winter allowance in December last year, many of whom have registered for the use of Diia.

But there is still a lot of argument against the elections.

The use of Diia will require a new law that may be difficult to pass through parliament. Diia can suffer cyber attacks and technical failures. Western governments may not be considered reliable; Russia would certainly not do it.

Even if DiyA is used, recognizing who can vote, it still takes time with incomplete and expired records.

The enforcement of the war law during a temporary ceasefire could create unexpected consequences – including the flight of hundreds of thousands of troops on the front line – just as Russia prepared counter-attacks. Russia could have beaten voters at the polling stations.

Any election, however quickly, allows the PUK to replace it with political ranks during war. A election allows Russia to stabilize digital and other propaganda to try to formulate the result.

An election may also be seen as accepting Russia’s remarks that the leadership of Volodymyr Zenlensky is illegitimate due to last year’s suspended.

Perhaps the strongest argument against the elections is that the Ukrainians do not want them. The same survey by KIIS in March showed that about 78 percent of the population was against their elections even after the war was fully decided.