Defendy Didier says Frickys are consented with consent, prosecution must be forced to prove

the Views The trial spends a lot of time in its “Frek of” aspect, and the issue here its defense consent says the confrontations are with the consent, and the prosecutor general needs to be proved the opposite.

TMZ is investigating the legal strategy around the vertebrae in our new documentary, “the collapse of the vision: the defense,” is now available on Tube.

Criminal defense lawyers, who have achieved some of the top nicknames in the United States, are publishing how to consent a major role in the trial of Didier.

Prosecutors should prove that they have used the vision in these parties if they are punished — barley tapepina, Mark Geragos and Jose Bayaz Explain why the defense will be self-confident that they can prove that these were the encounter of agreement.

The vision team describes all the victims who are allegedly described as former girls’ friends… and as these criminal defenders point out, it is not an easy task for the US Central Bank to convince the swearing-in-offs that these women are sexually traded.

We even had a fake swearing-indom board for the documentary, which He debated forcing and satisfied in detail and fiercely. … Before the vote on whether the victim’s view is guilty or not.