When Jin was told by someone who knew he had his nude pictures on a photo sharing website, he was in a complete shock.
Users had left raw comments and murders under the pictures. Some of them asked the posters to load more pictures of him.
“I couldn’t believe it,” Jin told the BBC. “Men were sexually happy from my pictures that I didn’t agree with sharing.
Jin, whose name has changed to the subject, is one of more than dozens of women in the same area of England who were hacked two years ago their social media accounts.
The BBC understands that they all had intimacy images – initially sent on social media with a direct message – published on the same website.
Some of the names of women have been published alongside their photos. Two of the women were under the age of 18 when the photos were taken, ie legally, they are classified as ugly images in children.
Jane later discovered that some other women’s photos were published on different sites.
“It makes me feel very angry that someone owns a content that I thought it belonged to me and was sent in a special way,” Jin said. “I feel really revealing it… it’s ugly.
It is a criminal crime where a person’s intimacy photo is published online without his consent, he is sentenced to two years in prison.
Some people call it a “porne of revenge,” even when the criminal is not a former partner and no motivation for revenge – but those affected prefer the term “use of dissident images.
‘Soft and decisive actions’
Jane is now calling on Ofcom’s media coordinator to investigate the use of its powers under the online safety law.
The law states 130 “page priorities” that companies should focus on obstruction, including postponing the inconsistent images.
Earlier this week, Ofcom was given new authority to suppress illegal content. Now technology companies must be sure that when employees are notified, they give priority to the reduction of materials, and have their own systems that help them do it.
Companies that break new laws can be fined up to £18 million.
Tessa Gregory, a partner of Legin Legin, represents Jin in his call for Ofcom.
he told the BBC porn help line revengewhich supports adults who experience misuse of intelligent images, helped jinn to follow the images by searching online reverse images and contacting pornography sites in his name.
Ms. Gregory said she now wants Ofcom “to take a quick and decisive action” against the sites.
He says Ofkom is going to make an online announcement when they start an investigation.
“We ask whether they are investigating this issue from now on, because it seems very common we are waiting for them to be them, but we have not found any evidence that they are,” Gregory said.
“He and Jin want to take action not only against the sites that have hosted their photos, but also against the search engines that people are directing these sites,” he said.
Ofkom told the BBC he was aware of the JN’s case and “cause any appropriate step forward.
“There are many executive powers to be held accountable for technology companies to fulfill their legal responsibilities in accordance with the online safety law, and “will not be sure to use them in the necessary place.
Locals at Ofcom have told the BBC that the organizer sets the sites at a priority based on various things, including the arrival and the danger they create to the people.
‘We thought it was special’
The IWF, which aims to eliminate children’s sexual assaults online, launched a campaign called Think before you publish it last year. It educates young people about the possibilities that spread naked images, and how can they be posted elsewhere without their consent.
Emma Hardy, on IWF, told the BBC that it often, until they find a picture or video, “I’ve already got out of control.
“It has already spread more than the trusted partnership, and it is likely to be sold online,” he said. “It is harvested and collected in a place where it is prepared for people who have sexual interests at that age or gender.
Jin is concerned that if action is not done quickly, his images will continue to spread.
“I know someone has the pictures stored on his computer, so I have no control over those pictures,” he said. “I think porn is revenge and misuse of unconscientious images of the arms and legs. You think they are gone, then it can be posted in the future.
But he believes that it is unreal and unrealistic to expect people not to publish their intelligent images in particular – and the task should be on websites that if they are stolen or leaked, they should not host them.
“I think it’s wrong to think that people will never send naked. Some websites have a duty to protect your secrets.
“There must be a change in thought, and not accuse the victim who sent the picture first. We thought it was special.
Explanation: This story has been renewed to explain which of the Comed site plans to be prioritized.