One main hope is on Downing Street when anti-terror investigators check the rubble of Nors Hyde power plant. Please don’t be connected to Russia.
It is so difficult that we need to ask why one fire has made 1,351 ground flights at one station and closed the world’s busiest airport for 24 hours. But if the investigations find evidence of destruction – and, in time, a evidence that goes back to Moscow – it will create a deep challenge to the architecture of the Western world security architecture.
Imagine that in such a scenario, Sir Kir Starmeret (maybe one may emerge in time, even if Russia is not guilty here). First, you will face the challenge that proves to the world that Vladimir Putin’s regime has really launched an attack.
That would be easier before the war in Ukraine. When Russia tried to assassinate Sergei Skripal on the streets of Salzborn, it sent its agents in GRU, its military intelligence agency, which was charged with the Soviet neuroscience. Bellingkat, a research website, was able to find the number of military identity cards and passports of secret operations: the evidence was unanswered.
Retrieved from: X/ @zain_0
But since the West has expelled so many Russian spies in recent years, Putin is now relying on non-professional foreign gangsters to carry out destructive attacks across Europe. Some are Bulgarian spies, as in late 2024, others are British citizens, such as Dylan Irell, 20, who admitted to burning Ukrainian ownership in western London.
If the Kremlin really wants to launch an attack on important infrastructure in the West, it is likely to use the middle man after the middle man in an attempt to obscure its resources. Putin knows that the Hybrid War will be the best effect when nothing will rise from a high level to accountability.
But in time, a relationship with the Russian state has been established in addition to suspicion. In 2016, NATO said a mixed attack on a member country could launch an answer to Article 5, in which all members must defend the victim. In 2021, he insisted that attacking important infrastructure could be considered an act of war. According to Russia’s participation – and the evidence of significant losses, as the groundwork for 300,000 passengers – the natural question is whether NATO will start the start of Article 5?
Take the tape forward and both answers, an attempt to “yes” and “no”, play with the Kremlin’s blessing. The UK could not only start Article It should have secured the consensus agreement of all member states.
Is Donald Trump’s United States, whether Hungary or even Italy, which threatens to fight Russia because of a small fire at a British power plant that no one has been killed? The horizon is funny.
The same is appropriate for Sir Kir’s decision to keep NATO away from proclaiming Article 5 in response to a Russian, Iranian or other mixed attack, or by sitting on evidence or refusing to lobby. Moscow, or anyone else, had to send a serious attack on important infrastructure would lead to brutal revenge on NATO.
Putin can try the Western answer to Russian destruction – Kirkuk Wiglesworth/AP
In both cases, Putin effectively gets cards to carry out the attacks unanswered.
Earlier this year, the European Policy Analysis Center, a Brussels-based Thought Institute, issued an urgent appeal to NATO to explain what Article 5’s response could lead to a significant mixed attack. The start of the bombings do not mean that the bombings are sent to the Kremlin. Clearly, the cost of costs for Russia (and the risks related to member states) could help provide purchases so that it would only be the second starting after 9/1
Burning a power plant can look at the sanctions imposed on nations that transport large amounts of Russian oil, such as India; It could seize the $200 billion from Russia’s frozen assets inside Europe. Whether Moscow is linked to the fireball from Hecero, it is time for Western leaders to increase their efforts to prevent such an attack.