Last week, while NFL teams were preparing to move towards Palm Beach in Florida, an AFC director spoke about the proposals of various laws that were expected to go to a vote. One of them was particularly interested – very similar to the rest of NFL – and also the poison: banning the potential of quarterback leaked, known as “paying the flavor”
“There is nothing to support him in an issue that deserves to be voted,” he said. “If it’s safe, the things that might Running doesn’t actually go to (cand a sound). We must not change the rules to avoid wounds that do not actually happen. … This is a proposal because some people are angry that the striker benefits from the defence and the eagles of (Philadelphia) only do better — different strikers, different organizers, they will just continue. It is now suddenly a injury, although the data shows?”
advertisement
“Think, if NFL works like that,” he said. “If some of these boys guided things around the years of Johnny, we would have voted for the front bus forbidden.
It was a hyperbolik front of Greenbe Packarz and Tim Mark’s alert, who many believe was the source of the Pakers’s suggestion to effectively ban the push. But it is also a moment when it shows the disrespect that changes a law without data to support it.
Bilz manager Sean McDdermott doesn’t seem to be a fan of Josh Allen’s push to the first Down. (The picture by Harry/Getty Images)
(Hary How to Getty Images)
The debate continued on Monday, when the AFC chairman met with Media and Billes Sean McDemermot, the Billis coach—which his team is performing a version of the potential but supports the ban—the proposal actively presents the proposal. His argument was that the lack of injuries did not necessarily give a detailed image of his risks. NFL Medical Chief, Allen Celes, will end in front and back, and becomes a key figure who advises the league’s office that he believes it is a legitimate concern if the game remains in the game.
advertisement
How could all this be played in a vote on Tuesday? It requires 24 out of 32 teams to approve Packers’ proposals that ban the play, and there seems to be a distant weakness. If nine teams vote against the procedure, they will fail. By Monday night, it turned out that 10 people were against the ban, three of which were for that and three were on the fence.
how it breaks.
Teams weak to prevent pushing (3)
Buffale Bilz: Coach Sean McDermott’s ban on pushing the case as an “active” measure on Monday was in a framework, despite lack of information that the game would lead to an increase in injuries.
Dallas Kawboyz: Stephen Jones, CEO and partnership of the team’s ownership, has been in favor of banning the play, indicating unity when the play “Leverage” is discussed. “In the stadium and extra points, the defenders are not allowed to attack the attacking line by pushing the back of their defence,” he said.
advertisement
Green Bay Packars: The ban was proposed by Green Bay on the table and the team leader Mark Merphy was strongly pro-grounded to get the game out of the game. Matt Laflor, president of coach and director general of Brian Gunkost, seemed to have anything to talk about on Monday, but Merphy has an order on the unit.
teams that seem to be weak against Banning Tush Push (10)
Baltimore Ravens: Barcelona president John Harbai has said he believes pushing the case as a “style game” was successful in something that seemed to be a bubble of criticism that is closer to a rugby screen. He added that he would be open to change his thinking in the game if his health and safety caused concern.
advertisement
Cleveland Browns: Coach Kellitist Kevin Stefansky came out against changing a law and said Browns predicted they would use their own version to push infections.
Detroit lions: Brad Holmes Director General said the lions were openly against the ban on pushing.
Houston Texas: Coach Demiko Ryans suggested that the ban should “punish the teams of the teams because they succeeded in implementing a play.
Indianpolis Colts: Previously, he was the organizer of the Eagle striker when the push was developed, and Co-pertos CEO Shane Stechn openly announced that he was against the ban on the play.
New England Patriots: Barcelona president Mike Vrabel has revealed that he is against the ban.
advertisement
New York Jets: Barcelona president Aaron Glen has revealed that he is against the ban.
Philadelphia Egsels: It’s their bread and donkey’s game over Nick Sirian IV, short and coach’s president. He was strongly opposed to the ban on the play and said it at every opportunity.
Tampa Bay Buchaners: Barcelona president Todd Bouls has revealed that it is the job of defenders to stop the game and have nothing against him.
Titanus Tennis: Barcelona president Brian Calahan has openly said it was a good game and that he was not in favor of being sacked outside football.
advertisement
Teams are sitting on the fence when there is talk of a ban on pushing (3)
Los Angeles Rams: We have achieved some disagreements in the RAM during the ban. “I don’t believe injuries to support the ban,” he told Yahoo Sport. But coach Sean McCae has come out and said two decisive things. First, that he does not believe that it looks like a “style game”, which is a common subject among critics of the push. Second, McCae said, I don’t think he should be allowed to enter the league first in the first place. Syned is unlikely to support the ban on the play, while McCae does not support it at all. The rams go to the fence without a clear unified ideological opinion.
advertisement
Kansas City Chiffs: Barcelona president Andy Reed has said both sides deserve it as an agreement can be banned if it puts a player at risk from health and safety.
Pittsburg Steelers: The club’s president Mike Tomlin has said he has thought about the debates that are against the play.
The course is expected to resume on Tuesday morning with a possible vote – or submit the proposal – soon.