Elon Musk on Sunday paid two Wisconsen voters $1 million and said a spokesman for his political group had presented the Wisconsens’s supreme supreme court, a technology billionaire, as critical of President Donald Trump’s agenda and the future of civilization.
“It’s a great thing,” he said on Sunday night. “I’m not calling him. I’m here personally.”
Masks and groups that support them have spent more than $20 million to help the desirable Brad shimeli in Tuesday’s race, which will determine the ideological structure of a court that could decide on key issues in the state of permanent warfare. Mask has become the center of the race, Susan Crowford and its allies, who are very interested in liberals and protest, and what they say is the effect he wants to have on the stadium.
“I think this will be important for the future of civilization,” he said. “That’s important.”
He said the state’s Supreme Court may resume redistribution of Congress, which can eventually affect which party controls the US Council.
“And if the Supreme Court (Wisconsen) is able to draw the districts, they will kill the district and deprive Wisconsen of two seats on the Republican side,” Musk said. “Then they will try to stop all the government reforms we are carrying out for you in the United States, the American people.
The state’s Supreme Court on Sunday denied hearing a final attempt by the Democratic Prosecutor’s Office to stop the check-ups from handing over to two voters, a decision that came just minutes before the rally began.
Two lower courts had previously rejected the legal challenge of the Democrats, who said Musk’s offer was violating a state law. “The Wisconsen law prohibits the offering of anything valuable to encourage anyone to vote,” Kaul said. “Now, Elon Musk just did that.
But the state Supreme Court, which is currently controlled by liberal judges 4-3, refused to take the case as an original measure. The court did not give any reason for his decision.
Kuul had no immediate statement on the court order.
Musk’s lawyers in recording the court’s claims said Mask would use the right to freedom of speech with the donors and any attempt to restrict it, which violates both the Wisconsen and the United States.
Musk’s lawyers in the court files say the payments “they mean to create a basic movement against the activists’ judges, not clearly defend any candidate or against any candidate.
Last year, the Mask Political Action Committee used a close equity tactic, proposing to give voters $1 million a day to voters in Wisconsen and six other war states that signed a request supporting the first and second amendments. A judge in Pennsylvania has said prosecutors have not been able to show that the attempt is an illegal attempt and allowed it to continue on election day.
Currently, most liberals are in court 4-3 in court. All four liberal judges have supported the Dan County County Susan Croford, the Democratic candidate.
Musk’s lawyers, about four hours before the rally began, demanded that two liberal judges who had campaigned for Crowford – Jill Carofsky and Rebecca Dalelet – to take back from the case. His lawyers pointed out that their work was “prostituted “unfit support” If they recover, the court will leave the court by a conservative majority by 3-2.
Both judges rejected the request and said they would in detail later.
One of the conservative judges of the court supported Shimel, a hat “Gull America again exaggerate” during Sunday’s election campaign.
In a national television interview, Schimel said he would “he would not control any of the expenses of any foreign group, whether it was Elon Musk or anyone else” and that Trump had asked whether “refending activists” and appliing the law.
“It’s exactly what I’m committed to anyone, whether President Trump, Elon, a mask or any donor, donor or voter or voter in Wisconsen. That’s my commitment,” Schimel told Fox News.
The competition has broken the national expenditure records for the judiciary, which has spent more than $81 million on expenses.
The Wisconsen High Court is expected to decide on the rights of abortion, redistribution of Congress, PUK powers and voting laws that could affect the mid-2026 and 2028 presidential election in the state.
_____
The Associated Press author Gary Fields has appeared in the report in Washington.